To be objective means to “not be influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.” From Covid-19 to the Capitol Riot, Americans need objective, fact-based journalism as much as ever to provide clarity on the events of the day, from the latest medical advice, to political debates, to foreign policy. But finding the best, most unbiased news can be a challenge, especially when one considers that more than 10,000 articles are published every day in the U.S. media ecosystem.
At The Factual, our news-rating algorithm is built to essentially measure how objective (or factual) any news article is based on four straightforward, transparent metrics, each of which answers simple questions:
- The number and diversity of links and meaningful quotes
Is the article supported by evidence? Does the article link to a diverse range of sources or just a few? Does the article include direct quotes (i.e., evidence of primary research)? This indicates whether the article is supported by facts. - The writing tone
Is the article written to convey information or to elicit an emotional response? Is the article heavily opinionated or strictly about conveying information? This gets to the core of objectivity — not allowing bias to influence the presentation of facts. - The topical expertise of the author
Has the author written on the topic (e.g., public health, business, foreign policy) before? How have past articles by the author on the same subject scored? This tells us if the author has relevant topical knowledge. - The article history of the publishing site
How have other articles from the same source scored? Are they typically well-researched? This tells us whether the publishing site has a record of producing quality journalism.
Please check your email for instructions to ensure that the newsletter arrives in your inbox tomorrow.
The combination of these four metrics gives us a Factual Grade for each article. We consider any article that scores 75% or higher as very likely to be credible — meaning it is well researched, written by an author with relevant topical experience, comes from a publisher that has a history of publishing reputable content, and is likely to be written in a neutral tone.
To read more about each metric and how they work together, see our How It Works page or watch this YouTube video. Below is an example of what a Factual Grade looks like for an NPR article.
Our Study
To establish which news sources are the most objective in the U.S. media ecosystem, The Factual scored a dataset of 828,000 articles from 53 news outlets — the total output of these sources from January 1, 2020 to May 18, 2021, a total of 504 days. By taking the average Factual Grade for each news outlet, we can generate an estimate of which news sources are the most objective on average. For reference, of the 828,000 articles in our dataset, just 17.8% scored 75% or higher, and only 0.4% scored 90% or higher.
- FactCheck.org
Average Factual Grade: 86.2% | Number of Articles Scored: 611 | Publisher Bias: Center
FactCheck.org is one of the preeminent fact-checking websites and lives up to that reputation by routinely topping The Factual’s lists of most credible sources. Through major events in 2020 and 2021, from Covid-19, to the Capitol Riot, to the presidential election, FactCheck.org has provided extensively researched articles to help readers separate fact from fiction.Highest Scoring Article: “Q&A on COVID-19”
Author: Jessica McDonald | Factual Grade: 98% - Smithsonian Magazine
Average Factual Grade: 82.7% | Number of Articles Scored: 5,299 | Publisher Bias: Center
Smithsonian Magazine’s coverage specializes in all things “science, history, art, popular culture, and innovation,” with the backing of the Smithsonian Institution — the world’s largest museum, research, and education complex.Highest Scoring Article: “Pottery Shard May Be ‘Missing Link’ in the Alphabet’s Development”
Author: Livia Gershon | Factual Grade: 99% - Undark
Average Factual Grade: 80.9% | Number of Articles Scored: 528 | Publisher Bias: Center
Undark is here to help us understand how science “collides with politics, economics, and culture, and where differing world views compete for resources and influence.” In 2020 and 2021, Undark has been asking important questions about Covid-19, government accountability, and a shifting climate.Highest Scoring Article: “For Babies Born Into Addiction, Punishing the Mother Is No Cure”
Author: Elizabeth Brico | Factual Grade: 90% - The Conversation
Average Factual Grade: 76.4% | Number of Articles Scored: 4,515 | Publisher Bias: Center
The Conversation uses an innovative model that depends on articles written by academics, leveraging the expertise of some of the world’s foremost experts on any topic. The site’s editorial teams then work to ensure content is both accessible and highly informative for a general audience.Highest Scoring Article: “5 strategies to prepare now for the next pandemic”
Authors: Tiffany A. Radcliff and Angela Clendenin | Factual Grade: 94% - Grist
Average Factual Grade: 76.0% | Number of Articles Scored: 1,292 | Publisher Bias: Moderate Left
Grist is an independent, non-profit media organization that specializes in climate, sustainability, and social justice. Established in 1999, their work has shined bright over the course of the pandemic and various climate-related disasters, from the wildfires in Australia to record cold temperatures in Texas.Highest Scoring Article: “Renewables surpass coal in US energy generation for first time in 130 years”
Author: Oliver Milman | Factual Grade: 93% - The Intercept
Average Factual Grade: 75.3% | Number of Articles Scored: 1,673 | Publisher Bias: Left
The Intercept seeks to hold the powerful accountable by pursuing changemaking journalism. Among their best articles are investigations of corruption, criminal justice reform, labor rights, and pollution.Highest Scoring Article: “Visa Rules Keep Immigrant Doctors From Fighting Coronavirus”
Author: Sharon Lerner | Factual Grade: 92% - FiveThirtyEight
Average Factual Grade: 74.0% | Number of Articles Scored: 1,625 | Publisher Bias: Moderate Left
FiveThirtyEight, best known for its data science journalism, had a busy year in 2020 covering the presidential election. However, they also use “statistical analysis — hard numbers — to tell compelling stories” year-round, from the impacts of Covid-19 to the performances of sports franchises.Highest Scoring Article: “How To Make Indoor Air Safer”
Author: Kaliegh Rogers | Factual Grade: 92% - Lawfare
Average Factual Grade: 73.3% | Number of Articles Scored: 1,260 | Publisher Bias: Moderate Left
Lawfare, run by the Lawfare Institute and with the backing of the Brookings Institution, is where the study of law and conflict meet. A host of legal and national security experts help the site cover topics like the pending U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, the legality of various quarantine orders during the pandemic, and the use of force related to events like the George Floyd protests and the Capitol Riot.Highest Scoring Article: “Three Cheers for Paper Hearings”
Authors: William Ford and Margaret L. Taylor | Factual Grade: 92% - Politifact
Average Factual Grade: 73.2% | Number of Articles Scored: 2,693 | Publisher Bias: Moderate Left
Politifact is a fact-checking group run by the Poynter Institute, one of the country’s preeminent journalism institutions. Politifact specializes in rating the truthfulness of political statements, helping to hold politicians to account and limit misinformation and disinformation, especially during the 2020 election and the Covid-19 pandemic.Highest Scoring Article: “Bernie Sanders was the roll call amendment king from 1995 to 2007”
Author: Linda Qiu | Factual Grade: 90% - National Geographic
Average Factual Grade: 72.9% | Number of Articles Scored: 1,746 | Publisher Bias: Center
National Geographic is a long-running staple of American journalism, covering science, culture, geography, and history. During the pandemic, it has served as a trusted voice on scientific issues, from the basic science of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to the latest discoveries in space.Highest Scoring Article: “Moderna’s mRNA vaccine reaches its final phase. Here’s how it works.”
Author: Nsikan Akpan | Factual Grade: 93%
How Did Everyone Else Score?
Below is a list of all publishers in our dataset. Our dataset is not a complete representation of the U.S. media ecosystem, in part due to the computing power needed to analyze the output of sites on a daily frequency. This dataset was only based on those sources for which we had data over the entire time period. However, the data does capture many major U.S. news outlets.
There are several reasons why certain sites may score lower than you would expect. For example, articles that do not always have attributable authors (e.g., Reuters) will score less well because we can’t be sure who is writing them. Likewise, some sites (e.g., CNN) only link to other articles on their site and therefore score less well because readers can’t easily verify facts from outside sources. In these instances, our algorithm is indicating that the content may warrant more scrutiny from the reader.
Publisher | Average Factual Grade | Number of Articles |
FactCheck |
86.2% |
611 |
Smithsonian Magazine |
82.7% |
5,299 |
Undark |
80.9% |
528 |
The Conversation |
76.4% |
4,515 |
Grist |
76.0% |
1,292 |
The Intercept |
75.3% |
1,673 |
FiveThirtyEight |
74.0% |
1,625 |
Lawfare Blog |
73.3% |
1,260 |
Politifact |
73.2% |
2,693 |
National Geographic |
72.9% |
1,746 |
Vox |
72.4% |
8,023 |
ABC News |
72.0% |
9,690 |
CNBC |
71.5% |
28,669 |
Propublica |
71.4% |
1,241 |
New Republic |
71.0% |
2,392 |
Business Insider |
70.7% |
15,070 |
Science Magazine |
70.4% |
1,028 |
Washington Examiner |
69.6% |
28,511 |
Reason |
69.0% |
5,901 |
New York Times |
68.4% |
56,994 |
MarketWatch |
67.6% |
4,100 |
The Nation |
67.4% |
3,091 |
NPR |
67.2% |
14,523 |
Wired Magazine |
67.2% |
5,107 |
CBS News |
67.2% |
20,728 |
Mother Jones |
66.9% |
4,021 |
LA Times |
66.9% |
29,519 |
The Atlantic |
66.7% |
5,358 |
Washington Post |
66.1% |
50,928 |
TechCrunch |
66.0% |
13,723 |
BBC |
65.7% |
14,242 |
Daily Beast |
65.6% |
11,053 |
Politico |
65.5% |
10,058 |
Quillette |
65.1% |
689 |
The Guardian |
65.1% |
61,470 |
Cato Institute |
64.3% |
668 |
New Yorker |
63.0% |
4,040 |
Reuters |
62.9% |
41,684 |
USA Today |
62.6% |
31,566 |
Real Clear Politics |
62.3% |
1,743 |
Wall Street Journal |
61.9% |
12,132 |
Financial Times |
60.3% |
19,532 |
Voice of America |
58.8% |
8,169 |
The American Conservative |
57.8% |
2,696 |
Popular Science |
56.7% |
924 |
Fox News |
55.3% |
64,122 |
The Federalist |
55.3% |
5,920 |
Al Jazeera |
54.3% |
16,600 |
CNN |
53.6% |
47,199 |
Breitbart |
52.8% |
42,764 |
National Review |
52.4% |
8,126 |
Washington Times |
50.3% |
73,068 |
Forbes |
49.3% |
19,673 |
Interested in hearing more from The Factual? Our daily newsletter uses the credibility algorithm to analyze 10,000+ articles every day to highlight the very best journalism on trending topics.
Want to score articles yourself? Our browser extension and our microsite IsThisCredible.com let you drill down into any article and see why we score it a certain way.